Wang Zhao: Agriculture is only suitable for people with feelings when entering the end of the law era.

This kind of scene will be played once a year at this time. If you remember correctly, it is generally shortly after the "two sessions" that the hot council for agriculture gradually cooled down and then disappeared. This phenomenon is depicted in a idiom, which is an anticlimax.

Everyone heard it, I am not coming to sing a hymn.

Wang Zhao: Agriculture is only suitable for people with feelings when entering the end of the law era.

Along with the agricultural drama staged in the spring of each year, there is also a phenomenon in the “No.1 Document”, that is, “the opportunity for agriculture has come”, “the next investment hot spot is agriculture”, “the agricultural ushered in the golden age”, etc. And so on. You will find that there were such articles two years ago, and there were such articles two years later, and two years ago two years ago, there were such articles. Four years ago four years ago, there were still such articles... These articles are reasonable. According to evidence, it can be said that the autumn is clear and the policy is insightful. But looking at it, I can't help but wonder: Is the opportunity for agriculture coming?

What time is it?

Agriculture does not matter

Ten years ago, when I started working on rural policy research, it was the beginning of the country’s new rural construction. For a while, I felt a little bit of blood, and I was very keen on preaching that "the opportunity for agriculture came." When someone knows that I am engaged in rural work, I often ask me if there is a great opportunity for development in the countryside. My answer is not only to tell them, but also what opportunities are available in agriculture. As for the "No. 1 document for ten consecutive years", it is also mentioned to others. A lot of people were fainted by me and started to farm. On the other hand, on the one hand, I continued this kind of flickering. On the other hand, I began to answer the questions I encountered in agricultural production and management activities that people who had been fooled into agriculture a few years ago complained about. Of course, answering these questions is also very simple: agriculture is a long-term, slow-moving industry. It is impossible to do it all at once, and don’t do agriculture with an eagerness to seek success. Undoubtedly, such an answer is a standard answer that both sides can agree with, and no one has ever questioned it.

However, I later slowly discovered that the problems encountered by those who wish to develop in the agricultural field for various reasons are not only because of the long-term slow effect of agriculture itself, but also the national agricultural policy. The problem in place.

Some people have spent a dozen years on a certain agricultural project and spent tens of millions of years. The result is still unsuccessful. Can it be said that it has not been long enough for more than a decade? Think carefully about the answer that “the cycle is slow and slow” is actually a very irresponsible nonsense – apart from the possibility of a few overnight riches, such as stocks, which industries are What do you do at a glance? Think carefully about the reasons why agriculture looks beautiful and difficult to do. It will be found that "beautiful" is only a macroscopic imagination or reasoning compared with thirty or forty years ago. "The taste; "hard" is that when I plunged in, I found it very skinny and cruel. To put it bluntly, the reason why agriculture is struggling is that the central policy on agriculture is always a thunderstorm.

Imagine that in the past few years, the central government has introduced many policies to support agriculture and farmers, but how many of them have actually been implemented at the grassroots level?

It has been two or three years since I did not regard agriculture as my "industry", so there is no longer any previous focus and entanglement. But I am rooted in the countryside, and sometimes I will "carelessly" see the article "Agricultural Opportunities Come" on the Internet or WeChat. It is said that I should turn a deaf ear to the article "Wolf is coming". However, two or three years have passed, and the Chinese have had too many expectations for agriculture. They can’t help but point in and see. Although the article is a revamp, but the view is basically old-fashioned - in addition to policy, or policy!

According to common sense, the proposition that “the opportunity for agriculture has come” seems to be no problem. Because of an industry or a project, there is always a good time to enter, such as the automobile manufacturing industry, the IT industry, and the cultural industry. The strange thing is that for agriculture, the slogan "The opportunity has come" has been drinking for more than ten years!

According to common sense, people from different industry backgrounds have different perspectives and perspectives on the issue, and the conclusions should be different. This is normal. Articles like "Agricultural Opportunities Come" are basically written by people outside the agricultural circle. Because for people in the agricultural circle, there is no discussion opportunity, and whether or not there is a chance, it has to be done. But the strange thing is that people from different backgrounds talk about agriculture, and their eyes will be on the policy. The answer seems to be a high degree of unity, but the result is always awkward!

What is more puzzling is that “the opportunity for agriculture has come” has been called for more than ten years. It seems that no one has seriously interpreted: Is there an opportunity for agriculture to be consistent for more than a decade? Or an opportunity for agriculture. Have you been coming for a long time, or have you been in the business for more than a decade?

To be honest, I don't understand more and more.

Until last month, after returning to the hometown organization Ningxia Tan sheep group purchase, I finally found the answer for the "agricultural opportunity". This thought stems from the fact that when I complained to the county magistrate about the government’s inaction with agriculture, I suddenly flashed a thought in my mind: Am I right? My brother Sisters and fathers and grandparents, haven’t they been doing agriculture without government support? Why do I complain if I don’t have government support? Is the reason for my agriculture just to get government support?

From the county bus to Yinchuan's bus, and from Yinchuan to Beijing, the problem has always been lingering. I finally want to understand: agriculture does not matter whether there is no opportunity, it is just inappropriate, and agriculture belongs only to people with feelings.